Guzman schooled Soto with ease. You might hate his style but he won fair and square. Blame Soto for losing, there is a reason he has 7 losses on his record. I don't get why people still hype Soto like the next great thing. The tittle he holds is the one left vacant by Pacquiao at 130. Soto hasn't even beaten a champion yet people act like he will give the elite hell. Will it take 10 losses for people to realize Soto ain't that fucking good?:dunno:
he did not school him. Soto landed the cleaner and harder punches. he just fell victim to Guzman's lazy and lackadaisical stink. i do agree that he needs some more wins to prove himself but i think what put him on the map was the ease with which he beat Juarez. at that point Juarez was unbeaten and expected to win a title. Instead, he would lose to Soto, but then go on to give Barrera hell, go the distance with JMM and KO Barrios. Plus, Soto knocked out Bobby Pacquiao vicously when Bobby was starting to become a commodity. But point well taken - his resume doesn't back up the threat perceived by him. He needs a couple of signature wins.