COME ON EVANDER!!!

For Holyfield to win a HISTORIC paper-title, he'd have to fight Chagaev, not Valuev, who doesn't seem to be able to handle stink tactics very well,... for it to 'really' be HISTORIC,.. he'd have to beat Wlad,.. for Evander to .. GET EM' BACK FOR AMERICA!!!.. he'd have to defeat both Klitschko's, to stop white-american journalists from crying about the state of the heavyweight division, Holyfield would have to reign as champion after defeating both Klitschko's, and KILL, ...KILLLL...every heavyweight European contender out there until, finally, oh god FINALLY,..they are filtered out of the system,...forever.... so ATLAST, we can all get back to normal.

 

Moorer never did anything but prove that he was some shitty average title holder (at heavy).

 

During the broadcast, did they bring up the point a couple of people already did in this thread...that this wasn't even for a world title?

Chagaev won the title less than a year ago and is now titled the "champion-in-recess".

Only a retard would think Valuev's title is anything other than an interim title and winning an interim world title doesn't make you a world champ until the title holder relinquishes his claim or is stripped. Renaming the champ's title doesn't take away his claim--WBA super champs are the champs...wba champs with a super champ in the same weight are interim champs...and now wba champions in recess, under these circumstances, are 100% the wba world champ

 

where is the modern-day Max Baer to come and wipe the floor with this big oaf?