I actually called my brother about a sig bet while I was away, and we'll see if his ethics are sincere since we never "had the agreement after the fact." I'm getting tired of faggots running their mouth and then playing semantics and backtracking. Rest assured if I make a wager or bet, I pay up that second when its over, win or lose.
I don't know the complete history here. I'm just saying unless both sides have confirmed and agreed to a bet it's void.
:: Ah,O.K. So when U RETURN to that Same Bets Forum after Hatton LOSES & 100 People SAY they TOOK U UP on your $50 Wager,U're Gonna PAY EVERYBODY even though U CONFIRMED w/NONE of them???... Of Course U're NOT Gonna Pay Up N that Instance...& U're LYING thru your Decay Infested Teeth if U Say U WOULD Pay Up N that Instance... A MAN Leaves NO Wiggle Room N a Betting Scenario...NONE:nono: ...Hence the OFFER,REPLY,CONFIRMATION Process that REED Pointed Out... REED didn't "Bitch Out" of Shit...REED Gave YOU AMPLE Opportunity to CONFIRM...It's ON the Thread for EVERYBODY to See... If Hatton had LOST,REED wouldn't B Sitting Here Saying U Owe REED Anything,Cause we DIDN'T Confirm... So Again,Blame YOURSELF Scrub... REED
my post was asking if he was gonna man up, no personal attacks, no bullshit. But in typical REEDtard fashion his immediate response is laced with superiority complex bullshit and flamming. Word is, he's a total faggot, and I don't take kindly to faggots who get high and mighty with me
right cause in that case ud be betting 50 dollars to 100 people...5000 dollars, or do u have trouble with multiplication? "REED gave you ample opportunity, you bitched out by not being online the entire time" If Hatton lost, I'd be the first muthafuckah on here asking you what my sig would be because I placed my name in this threads proverbial hat, it wouldn't matter to me that I didn't come back and affirm anything. Its the difference between someone with class, and a total bitch
U Don't Get it... It's IMPORTANT to JAWS to "Win" Something of REED's...Sig Space,Avatar,WHATEVER... JAWS has Been Trying to "One-Up" REED Since he Started Posting Here... If he Wasn't Such a Fucking COWARD,he'd have Made Sure to CONFIRM w/REED & the Rest would B History... REED
This is the kind of stupid shit that gets me on ur case. "You weren't online you were out at the mall and then at Nobleart's breaking bread with his family, any true man would've come online to check to confirm a sig bet." If it was Haymaker or Whiskey that accepted my bet by name, I'd be on here asking them if they would accept the terms since I would've obviously "accepted." Would I have come in the thread, made the bet, seen the person who accepted and backed out? WHOTHEFUCK would do that...besides you
Thanks for POINTING OUT the Importance of CONFIRMING,DUMBASS... If U DON'T Confirm, then what EXACTLY is STOPPING 100 People from SAYING,"I Accepted your $50 Offer" :dunno: ... That's why U CONFIRM EACH & EVERY Wager...PERIOD... It's TOUCHING that U're so Gung-Ho about "Getting" REED,but Blame YOURSELF for Being SLOPPY N this Instance... REED
you clearly don't have a legal background, and any supposed scenarios are irrelevant to this case, in which one person me accepted your offer. <!-- / icon and title --><!-- message --> "ALOT of U Bitches R BOLDLY Picking Hatton...N Fact,the MAJORITY of Ya'll R Picking Hatton.... Well,REED's Picking Castillo... MAN-UP,Bitches...2 Weeks....30 Days,WHATEVER.... WHO Wants Some???..SIG BET...WHERE ya NUTS @???" To which I responded, "I'll take Hatton against anyone's castillo" And then you affirmed again, "ANYONE's???... If So,REED is Game..." There is an offer and acceptance, which is all thats required for a legal contract. Unless ud like to hide behind some kind of "sigbet ethics" that are completely unlike the law.
REED JUST PM'ed U,Asking if U had a New Addy Yet... As Sweet Dick Willie Might Say,U're "GOTdamn" Right REED'll Bet U... DOUBLE or NATHAN... REED's Got Castillo,U've Got Hatton...AFTER the Fight,REED Either Owes U $100 or NATHAN... CONFIRM B 4 the Fight... REED ps. Speaking of Confirmations,WHERE YOU @,JAWS???:dunno:
your supposed clause after the fact is irrelevant. U made the offer, I responded, and u accepted. By responding I confirmed enough to a legal standard, this is fact, not speculation. Legally it was a contract when I responded, that is all.
CONFIRMED. Sorry about the address mix up when you sent my cash. My mailman needs to be shot still. REED:dunno: ps. REED & WHISKEY Handled their Business via PM....But as U Can CLEARLY C,EVERYONE that REED Bet w/CONFIRMED N Some Fashion...
"After" WHAT Fact,JAWS???...The "Clause" was IN WRITING PRIOR to the Fight... & REED made it CRYSTAL CLEAR that YOU Needed to CONFIRM the Bet PRIOR to the Fight...It's RIGHT THERE N your Face...REED even Used YOUR NAME... U "Responded" to NO ONE In Particular,JAWS...Which Takes us BACK to your $50 Scenario...If U Make a $50 Bet to NO ONE In Particular then LOSE that Bet,R YOU Gonna Pay 100 People who SAY they "Responded" to your $50 Offer??:dunno: ... Of Course U WOULDN'T...Hence,the POINT Behind CONFIRMING a Bet... REED
It's Not Bad... REED RESPECTS the Hell Out of Wayne Gretzky...He just MIGHT B the Greatest ATHLETE Ever... REED
you have offered an irrelevant red herring, and now you are denying documented legal standards. your knowledge of the legality of contracts is lacking, this is indisputable.
false, an offer and acceptance are the only necessary pieces for a binding contract. you simply don't know what ur talking about on this, as usual
Next Time U're N Vegas,Place a Bet on ANY Fight... Purposely LOSE your Confirmation Slip...& If your Pick WINS,Try to Collect... w/Out the CONFIRMATION of your Bet,they WON'T even Give U the Time of Day,Nevermind any MONEY... REED::
this is another severe fallacy. The case in which a person places a bet against another person is far different from the case of a person placing a bet amongst millions of others and then losing proof of said wager. In ur terrible analogy, all I'd need for a "confirmation slip" is the record of my post taking Hatton. we'll go ahead and call what ur saying CYC logic.