If Oscar DOMINATES Floyd,.........

You made a comment yesterday which was morally repulsive IMO, that is the only context in which I referred to your idiotic self. Otherwise, you're right, I have zero interest in what you have to say.

Back to topic, its hard to conceive of Oscar dominating Floyd, he would earn props if only for defying probability and the history of his boxing career to date

 

that's just it. how in the hell was it morally repulsive? all i did was make a comparison between two heinous crimes, and form an opinion as to which one is worse. imo, assault is a worse crime than statutory rape.

see. there is where i'm pretty damn sure you're having a hard time comprehending what i've written. judging from your responses, you'd think i was promoting statutory rape. or that i condone it. but i'm not and i didn't. all i did was make the claim that assault is worse.

 

I think it depends on the facts of each case. Sometimes, statutory rape is a senior in high school fucking a freshman in high school. I think if we are going to get judgmental, you'd find many of us who actually fucked girls in high school would have been charged. Legally, it is a strict liability crime. There is no explaination or defense, except in Alaska I think. Beating a women is almost never justified.

To be fair, I would love to hear an argument that Floyd is a better person than Oscar. That is ridiculous. Oscar is a flawed man and certainly not what he tries to portray as his image, but Floyd is trash. I have always appreciated his skills, but he is trash, his whole family is trash. BTW, I am tired of the Hip Hop apologist saying Floyd wasn't convicted. HE WAS!! He just didn't serve time. Furthermore, I doubt Oscar raped these girls forcibily. I think they wanted to fuck him and he he stupidly did it. It is a crime. Still, I was an 18 year old highschool senior and I'd be a fucking liar if I said I didn't want to bone some freshman girls who were 14 when I was there. Obviously, now the thought is sickening to me because I am old. An 18 year old guy wanting to fuck a 14 year old girl is understandable to me and not a criminal act, imo although it is legally.

 

agreed. not to mention a situation in which a girl lies about her age.

i agree though. it depends on the case. potentially, it can be a serious crime with the victim suffering considerably, as in the case when some old sicko decides that he will start dating a 14 year old.

 

There's more people picking DLH in this forum, DLH is the favorite here.

I will give credit to DLH if he dominates Mayweather, it will be the first time he dominates a very good fighter but I won't be on his nuts like a lot here, DLH is popular and very good and fought everyone but fact is, he barely has wins over the best he fought. I'm picking DLH because he's a lot bigger, stronger and IMO Floyd has no bussiness at all at 154 but I'm not expecting him to dominate so, a KO would go a long way for him.

 

That's because people scored those fights for Whitaker and Quartey.

If Oscar wins clearly, people won't say that. They may bring up the weight, but won't say he lost.

 

but even the fights he clearly won he gets no credit for. Chavez was over the hill. Ruelas "sucked." G. Hernandez he beat at 135. Vargas was shot. La la la.

 

He does get credit for it, for the most part.

Only the most picky detractors don't give him credit for it. They're good wins.

Just because he doesn't get as much credit for beating Vargas as Tito does, or he would have if he'd beaten Hernandez at 130 or if Chavez was younger, it doesn't mean he's not given credit for it.

And going by the way you talk, why should Oscar be given credit if he beats Floyd? You've said for the longest time that Floyd did nothing of note above 135 and is extremely overrated. So why should a guy who's been a jr. middle since 2001 be given so much credit if he just beats an overrated guy who never did anything above 135?

 

When I was 18, I wasn't terribly into 14-year-olds. Things have changed now. :stir:

 

Look at the weigh in shots, Oscar does not look "a lot" bigger than Floyd. A bit bigger yes, but not hugely so.

It's only about the difference between Duran and Leonard, and that didn't stop Roberto.

If Oscar defeats Floyd decisively, he deserves a lot of credit. Floyd is not tiny. He's filled out since his lightweight days.

There is about a 2 inch difference in height, and to be honest floyd looks just as bulky and muscled.

 

U're FULL of Shit,Dog...

YOU PERSONALLY Play that SAME EXACT Game w/the Resumes of Fighters U DISlike...

So DON'T Get Bent Out of Shape when Somebody Does it to DeLa ...

Like REED has Said a MILLION Times,ANY Fighters Resume can B DISSECTED & Made to Look WORSE than it is...



REED

 

I don't know man, it would pretty hard to take apart Calzaghe's resume.

 

Yeah, because it looks like shit to start with.

 

LOL

 

one judge had oscar winnig and it was a close fight all the way, sodont rewrite history...

 

hahaha you still play poker online ron?

 

one judge was about as bright as some halfwit who's 'career' is playing poker and then tricks off winnings at breakneck speed.