In the past I have kidded Obama supporters about him being their Saviour ...

That's what I mean ... so 3.5 years before all hell starts to break loose is ...

.... 2011.

Anyway ... my point being ... 2009 would be too soon if I was understanding your meaning.

 

ANYWAY ... this wasn't supposed to be a religious debate.

I am simply pointing out that many are seeing Obama as something other than ...

And Farrakhan it would APPEAR is referring to Obama as a messiah.

I don't see what other context you could make of that.

And it appears he's telling this to the nation of Islam.

Also , if I'm not mistaken , I thought I once read where the NOI founded by Fard is a pseudo muslim/christian organization that does not hold to strict muslim teachings . So using the term Messiah might not be a big stretch.

:dunno:

 

The rabbit hole on this guy is very deep. I heard that info will be released saying that Obama's harvard education was funded by Saudi Arabia.

 

http://fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=702365&postcount=35

.

 

Petre's threads, and I disagree with many of them, are nothing like InI's threads.

Petre's threads, as kooky as they may sometimes be, at least invite discussion and debate.

InI's threads are usually nonsensical statements that offer no real opinion other than 'rightwingers are gay' and sometimes include an article from some crackpot website that he didn't even read. And they tend to come in swarms of 10 or so.

TFK

 

I'm with TFK on this one.

 

:nono:

 

You guys are crazy with all this anti christ talk. I have a hard time believing you guys take that stuff, that seriously.::

Sorry.

 

Thank you ... :bears:

Change kooky to controversial and you understand what I try to do.

Like I told Jake in the other thread ... if we all just agreed on every topic , we'd have one great big circle jerk. I'd rather throw something out their at an angle that invites debate.

 

LOL. I guess it's out. I heard about it yesterday and I thought it would be released on Monday because of the news cycle. It has the potential to die out quick and I think it might have, especially with the coddling by the media.

BTW January 2009+3 1/2 years= July 2012

 

I'm just making conversation Baron , and happen to know the bible pretty well.

I don't interpret it like most do , though I do believe there is truth to it and we have it for more than some interesting stories.

I believe it was written with understanding of the time.

 

I find it hard to believe that the nation of islam, with numbers between 25k and 100k, could have absolutely any bearing on the reality of the anti-christ or perception of Obama being the anti-christ.

The numbers are too few.

 

It's not solely because of the them. All nations and people will accept him once he arrives. There is more to come.

 

Oh well, I guess you're fucked then.

 

Nah, I'm good.

 

What's your point? This video is from February of this year even before Obama had the nomination. Obama publically renounced any support from Farrakhan.

:dunno:

 

You've repented for wanting to fuck a murderer already? Was that before the wank or after?

 

I gave you a credible response...now post the video of Obama denouncing Farrakhan.

I'd say a new low but I'm certain you'll go lower Petre.

This is pathetic on your part.

 

Before and after

 

A few things to add...note "Savior's Day" on the front of the podium...that date is February 26, which coincides with this speech.

Very disappointing from you Petre...btw...(and you can ask Jake if you don't believe me)...

I pretty much called your bringing up Farrakhan and Obama at some point. Thought it would be more along the lines of them both living on the South Side of Chicago, but you managed to go even LOWER than I expected.

It's also funny that the SAME night this appears on Bill O'Reilly's show...you create a thread about it. Hmmmm.....

This is an old and dead issue. Where are your threads about the increasingly racist and angry tone the McCain rallies have taken on over the past few days?

Obama denouncing farrakhan support on Meet The Press with Tim Russert...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4pcZ2u8h_g

 

The Only PROBLEM is, it's OBVIOUS that Petre would B MORE "Comfortable" w/McCain In Office than Obama...He'll NEVER ADMIT it, but it's OBVIOUS...Petre THINKS he's Being COY about it, but Again, it's OBVIOUS....

There's an UNDENIABLE, UNMISTAKEABLE Sense of Venom N the Posts, when Petre Criticizes Obama, as Opposed to when he Criticizes McCain...In Fact, 99% of the Time, Petre ONLY "Criticizes" McCain Right BEFORE or Right AFTER he's Posted a Looooooooong Ass ANTI-Obama Tirade...

Petre THINKS it Makes him Look "Objective", yet OBSERVANT Posters See Right THRU that Shit...REED's Seen Right THRU Petre's BULLSHIT Since 2001....

Sure, Petre "Invite's Discussion & Debate", but @ the Same Time, Petre has NEVER EVER, Not Even 1nce ADMITTED when he was WRONG or the Least Bit OFFBASE on ANY Subject...EVER!!!!...

INSTEAD, he'll Say he was "JOKING" & PATHETICALLY Wonder why NOBODY Else "Got" his Joke:boohoo:...

Basically, Petre's a More SERIOUS Version of I & I...

REED:kidcool:

 

Many people, myself included feel that way. But thinking McCain is the lesser of two evils does not equal support for McCain.

Sadly, not everyone is smart enough to realize that, and confuse dislike of Obama with support of McCain.

It's kinda like choosing a punch to the face over a kick to the balls. All things considered, you'd rather not have either.

TFK

 

Welcome to 6 months ago Muzse ... You called something done long ago ::

I brought all that up back then , including Obama denouncing Farrakhan.

I swear ... some of you just read the name OBAMA and immediately lose clarity of thought and just rush in to judge the messenger without even listening to the message.

Let me repeat myself ... THIS IS NOT A THREAD CRITICIZING OBAMA ... :nono:

Maybe it will help in bold enlarged type ...

THIS IS NOT A THREAD CRITICIZING OBAMA :nono:

Unless there's something I don't know ... Obama has no control over what Farrakhan preaches.

The point is not what Obama thinks .... it's what Farrakhan is preaching to the Nation of Islam ... you know ... the organization that organized the Million Man March ?

One more time ...

THIS IS NOT A THREAD CRITICIZING OBAMA :nono:

Pathetic on your part that you rushed to judgment attacking the messenger instead of taking the time to understand the very SIMPLE message.

Oh and one more thing ... Not only does Farrakhan have the ear of the NOI , but as seeing as the Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC) gave its highest social achievement award to Farrakhan, back in December of 2007 (shortly before I brought it up ::) it would appear his words have the respect of at least THAT one large "Christian" organization.

Do you fathom where I'm going with this yet ... or do you still simply see the name OBAMA ?

 

Reed ... If you think for a moment I'd be more comfortable with McCain , than you don't understand me at all.

I don't want either of them.

And you can believe with every fiber in your soul that if the lame duck candidate was a democrat , and McLame looked to be the heir apparent , he'd be getting a LOT more of my attention.

Tell me ... what point is there telling McCain haters , why they shouldn't vote for him either?

You can think I somehow support McLame ... and I can tell you , you'd be dead wrong.

 

That is precisely it. And when pressed I begrudgingly say , at this point McCain does less damage. And my reasoning is simple.

No socialist health care plan that will bankrupt the country that's already going bankrupt.

No higher taxes (an issue Obama has flipped on , only to counter the claims being made) but in reality anyone with an ounce of "cents" knows to implement his plans will require MUCH HIGHER taxes.

No one here is a big McLame supporter so , what is the point of trying to convince anyone he's bad? Everyone already feels he's just more of the same.

He's the devil we know.

The problem we currently have in this 2 party election is this ...

We don't need more of the same , and we don't need change when it's change for the worse.

More of the same is only slightly better than change for the worse.

I won't support either and when this is all done and Obama gets elected and turns out to be a disaster ... I'll have done my part to try and prevent it no matter what anyone tries to say differently.

 

But I get a warning for spamming. :laughing:

Countless rumors that have no factual foundation, and countless anti-obama threads, don't count as spam, in petre world.

 

:bears::bears::bears:

 

If a country is already going bankrupt then it don't matter who is president.

Are you complaining about obama spending tax payer money, but more of the same bush like spending american money on wars started on lies is just fine and dandy. It's good for republicans to spend like money is flowing out of their ass, but when democrats spend, well it's just evil. Double standards, sure to make your cock hard. :hammert:

And it's not a two party system.

 

You must really struggle in school.