Is Floyd going to retire when he gets out? "Sorry sportsfans, I lost my muscle tone during my 40 days in lockup, there's no coming back from that. I know, I know............Willie Pep came back from a broken back in a plane crash and Vinnie Pazienza broke his neck and George Foreman took 10 years off and over-ate fried food products...............but, but, but, I was forced to eat commissary food for over a month and deprived of my sycophants yelling sweet nothings in my ear 24/7. That's unacceptable, it's intolerable.................why I would even call it.....................inhumane." They say Floyd is depressed. Wonder if he'll hang himself with one of Fiddy's smuggled in sweat socks. :boohoo:
What Floyd is eating is what he wants to eat. He has access to three meals a day. being a celeb, im sure he can get more. He is just bitching cause his personal chef isnt making it and it's not seasoned.
You're lucky as hell. You can eat whatever you like and not gain a pound.:clapagain: Wish I had that kind of body type. Some folks are lucky that they can't put on weight but can eat like elephants!
Its natural to put on weight. Its also question of what you are eating. 2000 calories of potatoes eaten from 12pm to 6pm will have a less fattening effect than 2000 calories of potato chips eaten from 10pm to 11pm.
The problem with prison for Floyd is, and the reason he's undernourished, the Protein shakes cost more then 50 cents. Floyds missing that 50 cent shake. That's why he wants to go to Gen Pop. Maybe he can find a shake that only cost 25 cents there. Of course, if he finds a 25 cent shake in prison............that 50 cent shake may not be waiting for him when he gets out. It's a tightrape............I mean rope..........a tightrope he has to walk. :hump:
It is weird to be honest, my girlfriend gets pissed off no end, the fact that I can just eat as I please and stay EXACTLY the same size. I'm 30 now, and still eat like a fucking pig, and basically don't put any weight on at all. I eat a shit load of butter and cheese too, and often eat huge quantities of slow cooked beef. Apart from just being naturally lean, the only thing I can think of is I burn off quite a lot of energy, apart from going for a quick run every day with my dog, I am just constantly running and jumping around my house, I'm fairly hyperactive.
Either it is false or it is not. My understanding of it was that the delivery of large calorific values into the system, especially in the form of processed foods over a very short period of time, was an invitation to gain weight.
If the same amount of calories are consumed on average daily for any period of time, it's not going to make a difference. How you eat, when you eat, and what you eat are all insignificant or meaningless relative to how many calories you eat over that same period of time.
Ah yes....but......lets take it a step further then. A guy eating 2500 calories of green beans is going to gain the same amount of fat and decline in general fitness in an identical manner to a guy eating 2500 calories of processed chips, with both men burning 2000 calories a day??? Unlikely.
In other Floyd news, he commented on the Pac vs Bradley fight. "Tell that nigga Pac I said hahahahaha"- Floyd Mayweather via 50 cent
I used to have my own routine. Wake up, eat some cereal or something. Eat 2 Whoppers with coke and large fries at around 1pm or 2pm. Eat chocolates and chips at 6-7pm and then at 11pm or midnight do 90 minute run and/or burn 1000 calories while running.
Ah yes, this is the same Floyd who is cleaning up boxing. His first response to a fellow professional being robbed is to have a laugh at it. If Bradley got robbed, the boot would be on the other foot, Floyd would be talking about drugs and cheats and the need to clean it up. :shit:
In that case, there would probably be a difference due to the fiber content of green beans. Generally though, what you are saying is exactly correct. Purely in terms of weight, why do you think it would make a difference what source the calories are coming from? If you know what a calorie is, that makes no sense. In terms of weight (ignoring all the health benefits of green beans), the reason eating green beans is better than eating potato chips is because potato chips are significantly more calorie dense than green beans. You can lose weight eating chips and cheese and Snickers bars, if you want to. I'd suggest you get a good amount of protein for muscle sparing (you'll be getting carbs and fat from other sources, obviously), but other than that you'll be fine. I know, coz I've done it. Having said that, it is MUCH easier to stay under a calorie limit by eating "clean" - you get way more bang for your buck in terms of calorie density. I'm not suggesting you start dieting on potato chips, but as long as you fall under your calorie requirements for the day, you will be fine if you eat a bag of chips. And yeah, 800 calories is indeed low as others have mentioned.. but if you can sustain it, then there's no real problem with that either. Very obese people are often put on 800 calorie a day liquid diets, they don't die or anything.
That means he's refusing the food provided to him. He has only himself to blame for that. They don't starve prisoners.
:: Careful my friend. Bieber is a member of the Mickey Mouse Club gang. You better take heed before they come get you.
I'm not very obese or anything, In fact I have excellent fitness levels all things considered, but I am 33 now and can't just drop 10lbs like I used to. One of the Mentzer brothers of Bodybuilding fame used to have the philosophy that a calorie is a calorie is a calorie and that it was perfectly sound to eat so-called "junk" food provided the person eating it burned off the calories in question. Once the calories were burned off, the fact that the food was junk, or "empty calories" became irrelevant, in his view. This is pretty similar to your philosophy of calories being calories, all other things being equal. The thing is, not all other things are equal. Mentzer had massive muscular mass which could easily provide the contractions required to burn the extra calories, and also did not display any pre-existing adiposity as such. Theoretically, a calorie is indeed just a calorie, and 3000 calories of beans is the same as 3000 calories of Foie Gras, but......in practice, well, its different.
EL PRESADOR! <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/r13lM60SlgE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>