Navarrete vs. Suarez thread

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Dog Jones, May 11, 2025.

  1. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    37,572
    Likes Received:
    4,040
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    The California State Athletic Commission is expected to convert Emanuel Navarrete’s controversial technical decision victory over Charly Suarez to a no-contest, BoxingScene learned Saturday night.

    Full story: boxingscene.com/articles/calif…
     
  2. ButterbeansDad

    ButterbeansDad Leap-Amateur

    Joined:
    May 30, 2020
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    151
    Suarez made a mistake - punching Navarette so hard and accurately in the face, causing a cut.

    Cost him the fight.
     
  3. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,959
    Likes Received:
    2,120
    That shoulb be overturned for a win to Suarez. If the cut was bad enough for the fight to be stopped, its irrelevant that a bad call was made beforehand.
     
  4. ButterbeansDad

    ButterbeansDad Leap-Amateur

    Joined:
    May 30, 2020
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    151
    Should be but we are talking about Top Rank. Bob "Yesterday I was lying, today I'm telling the truth" Arums company and philosophy permeates it. Navarette corruptly got a lot of time to recover from Liam Wilsons left hook when he was very badly hurt also.

    One day some lunatic fighter who gets robbed is going to get a gun and start shooting all of the people involved in robbing him. I'm surprised it hasn't happened already, considering how much work boxers put in to getting a chance to fight in big fights, only to have some grand larceny pulled on them in broad daylight by some old fat corrupt white/Jewish men who profit from it.
     
    Double L likes this.
  5. ButterbeansDad

    ButterbeansDad Leap-Amateur

    Joined:
    May 30, 2020
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    151
    Valero probably would have done it.
     
  6. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    37,572
    Likes Received:
    4,040
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    Ruled a no contest

    Wbogus orders immediate rematch
     
  7. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,649
    Likes Received:
    1,828
    On what grounds?
     
  8. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,649
    Likes Received:
    1,828
    Navareete should fight that tall featherweight that beat R. Ramirez
     
  9. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    37,572
    Likes Received:
    4,040
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    on what grounds ? :duck:

    the grounds that the cut that ended the fight was caused by a punch not a headbutt?
     
  10. Flo-Raiden

    Flo-Raiden Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2020
    Messages:
    2,230
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    Gender:
    Male
    Everyone knows that was a punch that caused the cut but because Navarrete is one of Top Ranks favorites they couldn’t afford to have him lose.

    At least they’re ordering an immediate rematch. Just hope its more fair this time.
     
  11. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,649
    Likes Received:
    1,828
    Then why no contest? That's my point. If it was ruled a punch, why is it not a loss for Navarette? So there must be some grounds (unknown to me) for now calling it a no-contest. Apparently, you haven't thought this through.
     

Share This Page