You think the reason you get robbed blind paying for these things is because a few people choose not to? No, it's because you're willing to pay. Do you honestly think you can succeed in making me feel guilty about depriving Disney of my 50 bucks? And why on earth would I feel bad about choosing to watch for free on a little pop up screen on my laptop while you choose to spend in-person ticket money to watch it on a larger screen? I didn't force you to do that... Stop failing to make any good points...
And if I had said that my refusal to pay $50 to watch my own television was because I didn't want to give billionaires money, you'd have a point But that isn't why ... it's because it's an outrageous rip off. Massive waste of money
McDogg you're my boy, but you sound kinda cheap about this absolute refusal of PPV. Everything in life is highway robbery and a rip off. Everything. Hell, tomorrow I gotta drop probably over $200 just to take the family to Six Flags. Very few things are actually worth the money. That's just the reality of life.
Just to keep things factual, it's more like 75 than 50, correct? 50 is what it was probably the last time dogg paid for one.
I spend only on that which is worthwhile $50 for the pleasure of watching my own television for a couple of hours is not worthwhile
If it weren't for you "honest consumers", the PPV model would've suffered the immediate death it deserved You need to be mad at the people that have convinced you shelling out live ticket prices to watch your tv is a sensible state of affairs
Yea, not buying the LA doesnt support boxing angle. Haymon always overprices these events where ever they take place and then has to drop them at the last minute and/or give away tickets. It's happened plenty of times in Barclays
It's a MEANINGFUL Fight Though... And What the Main Event May Lack in suSPENCE is Made Up For by the Stacked Undercard... Like REED Said, this is THE Best PPV Card of 2019, from Top to Bottom...Miss it @ Your Own Risk... REED
I don't think the ME lacks in suspense. Sure Spence is the favorite, but he showed some vulnerability against Brooks, whi is pretty much at the same level than Porter
No, Brook Proved to Be a Higher Level Fighter than Porter, Nevemind the FACT Their Styles are Entirely Different... STYLES Trump LEVELS... Ken Norton Wasn't On Ali's LEVEL, yet his STYLE Troubled Ali Every Time They Fought... REED
Dirrell-Benavidez Will Be Competitive Until Benavidez Takes Over and Lopez-Molina Jr. Should Be Fan Friendly as Fuck... REED
No he hasn't . Such nonsense. Porter is more proven and their fight was close as hell. And yeah style trump level. And we don't know how Spence will react to Porter style
Yes He Has... You and Doub Have This Strange Preoccupation w/Portraying Porter-Brook as Some Back and Forth Bout That Could've Gone Either Way, Yet the EYEBALL TEST Doesn't Reveal Anything Close to That...Brook Won 8-4 @ WORST, More Like 9-3... Now, if All You Want to Do is Rehash a Fight that's 5 Fucking Years Old, Have @ It...REED'll Respectfully DECLINE and Focus on TONIGHT's Action... REED
I've shown many times that the media scorecards had the fight really close. If you prefer to live in a little fantasy world, be my guest. But beside in a few bubbles (fightbeat being one of them), it is considered a real close fight
If Kermit thinks this fight is competitive then he should go wager his francs on the grappler with what should be enticing odds
Molina Jr Just MIGHT Have Worse Defense than Jarrett Hurd... Sucker for a Right Hand, Eating Left Jabs... REED
Goosen's Capable But Lennox is AWFUL... Albert's an Upgrade Over the Guy USUALLY Doing FOX Broadcasts w/Lennox and Goosen Though... REED
Lummox has somehow, someway actually REGRESSED from his Boxing After Dark days. He was bad on BAD, but he's utterly putrid on Fox.