Well Petre, what exactly are you guys saying. That McCain is better? Or is what you're saying that Bush is better. So you guys think it's better to run with a proven failure than reup with someone who might do better. I mean you guys are complaining about every candidate available acting like you'd prefer to keep Bush. Unbelievable. By the way I think McCain will wind up winning the election. Obama was brought in to swing the white vote to McCain's favor. At least that's the way they're going to play it once they doctor the numbers and voting machines.
Wait, according to Petre, Hillary was the one chosen by the NWO to be the next president. :dunno: :dunno: :dunno:
Hillary was the bitch of the bunch to give the rest of the votes to McCain, the Democrats are just a front for the Republicans.....get with the program :nono:
The plot thickens :laughing: <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pSQFySxzznw&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pSQFySxzznw&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Jesus Christ!!!!!!!!! <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t3duEgdlkug&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t3duEgdlkug&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Now you guys know the connection, you can connect the dots. <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l1IVDizjsMQ&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l1IVDizjsMQ&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
I try take everything with a grain of salt, with politics though I'm certain things don't work the way we're led to believe so yeah, with the way many of the laws have been changing and stuff I do kind of believe in the NWO.
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uZN2fTGcBUw&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uZN2fTGcBUw&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Zbigniew Brzezinski jumps on board with Obama , becomes his top advisor and VOILA! Obama starts to run away with it. Brzezinski is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York and attended meetings of the Bilderberg Group. I said a long time ago , the next president would have ties to the Council on Foreign Relations , the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderburgs. Up until late last year when Brzezinski jumped on the Obama express , the only one was Hillary. Laugh say I'm switching my pick , whatever ... That is what I said. They would have connections to these organizatons as has been the case for the last 50+ years.
Barack needs to put a muzzle on Michelle as she may single-handedly ruin his chances of either the nomination or the general election with her ill-advised statements! :doh: It just goes to show once again that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link.
Now this is funny. The Council on Foreign Relations is one of the most diverse groups you'll ever see. From Angelina Jolie to Henry Kissenger are current members. I can name a handful that have endorsed Hillary. I can name a handful that have endorsed Obama. And I can name a handful that have endorsed McCain. Yep... That's a tell tale sign all right!!! Voila!!!! Nice try Pete, but you have gone throught so many candidates as "THE CHOSEN ONE" than no one takes you seriously any more. OOOOOH look, Obama is the one, just like I said. Bull :shit: :shit: :shit:
I didn't expect you to understand. I guess because the CFR , an organization that was coming under more and more scrutiny , made Angelina Jolie an honorary member to help give them a friendlier face , that they're less powerful than they are. And of course the fact that this organization has 3 candidates all front running , no conflicts there. I'm not claiming here anything beyond what I said in my post ... I MAY BE WRONG and it may be Obama. When I read Brzezinski was on board with Obama , I realized someone besides Hillary had powerful support from the CFR. And I DID say long ago (Hell the thread may still be out there) that if it wasn't Hillary it would be someone with CFR support/ties as our next president. I said that before the 16+ candidates began ANY debates.
Well Petre, what exactly are you guys saying. That McCain is better? Or is what you're saying that Bush is better. So you guys think it's better to run with a proven failure than reup with someone who might do better. I mean you guys are complaining about every candidate available acting like you'd prefer to keep Bush. Unbelievable. Also what is the CFR?
:: :: :: ..You indicate I don't understand.. Well, you need to brush up on the COFR.. There are 5 actual members of the COFR that ran or are still running for President in 2008. There are 6 current or former candidates that had the endorsement of one or more COFR members. Your rationale that support from a single member of the Council of Foreign Relations some how swung the election for Obama doesn't hold water. BUT I DON'T EXPECT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT. :: :: :: :: What a momo. And for the record, you said 'Hillary will be the next President, mark my words"
Yep ... Obama is the smart vote alright. :clap: <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wKsoXHYICqU&rel=1&border=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wKsoXHYICqU&rel=1&border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"width="425" height="355"></embed></object>