The Daily Obamanation .... ALL ROLLED INTO ONE

petre has been saying nonsense like this? phonetap thought the guy said he has a black wife...IF petre has been talking like this, she must be proud of her husband. ::

 

Clueless as usual ... :doh:

 

Some of you might note that their MISSION STATEMENT was changed.

Why change something there's nothing wrong with.

 

So please clue me in on where in that mission statement, does it say to put down other races.



Let's not forget, ladies and gentlemen, Ron Paul is the candidate that recieves support from white supremists.

 

more conseravtive right-wing bullshit petre has latched unto. this guy is an alan keys lackey...:laughing:

 

Should this cracker be scared?

 

Because there are people out there whose vision is clouded by their racism and might take it the wrong way?

 

Only a fool would not realize that all the candidates received WHITE SUPREMIST SUPPORT.

EVEN OBAMA Who one group said they would support Obama over Hillary ... look it up.

:kick:

 

Sorry dude ... there's only one way to take it. That it's coupled with religion is all the worse.

When you consider that this is the Church that the potential President adheres to ??? :doh:

 

great way to defend it...:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

 

I am scaaar't! It's Zimbabwe all over again! :eeeek:

 

Says the guy obsessed with Bible prophecy! :nono:

 

:doh:

...is all I have to say

 

Obama belongs to a racially centric church that preaches one race above others.

Someone pointed out that A racist sent Paul a donation.

Which is worse ?

Any more weak substance less arguments ?

 

That's because there is nothing to say about it.

Had this been the Mission Statement of Paul's church , you guys would have been screaming bloody murder.

Guy's like Tap surprise me , because deep down , as a religious guy , I know he knows this type of teaching is patently wrong. But he'd rather put his faith , and God aside , then denounce Obama's church.

Faith in man over god ... :doh:

 

Please point out to me where it preaches one race above all others.

 

Dude ... if you cannot see the focus here or go to their website and learn something ... I can't help you.

True christian religion is not racially exclusive , and should not preach race in any way.

I don't expect you to understand , and I'm not here to teach it to ya.

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/16/politics/animal/main3721817.shtml



(Political Animal) <!-- sphereit start -->RON PAUL'S RACIST SWILL....I haven't blogged before about James Kirchick's piece in the New Republic that blew the whistle on the years worth of racist swill that was published in the Ron Paul Political Report during the early 90s, but to make a long story short, it turns out that during the early 90s the Ron Paul Political Report published years worth of racist swill.

Over at Reason today, Julian Sanchez and David Weigel do some further investigating and come to this conclusion:

Ron Paul may not be a racist, but he became complicit in a strategy of pandering to racists — and taking "moral responsibility" for that now means more than just uttering the phrase. It means openly grappling with his own past — acknowledging who said what, and why. Otherwise he risks damaging not only his own reputation, but that of the philosophy to which he has committed his life.​

Question: what's the difference between a "racist" and someone who was "complicit in a strategy of pandering to racists"? Nothing, as far as I can tell, except that at least the former is bit more honest about things.

So as damning as everyone thinks this stuff is, I think it's even more damning than that. We're not children here, after all. It's plain that Paul knew what was being published in his newsletters. It's plain that he was familiar with the well-developed strategy that inspired the early-90s turn to racist demagoguery. It's plain that he knew it was a key part of his fundraising appeal. Paul can weasel all he wants, but it's plain that he endorsed a strategy of overt appeals to racist sentiment in order to build support for his political career. If he's given all that up since then, it's only because he no longer needs it.

This whole affair highlights one of the reasons that I wish everyone would stop swooning over minor candidates who play the part of bold truthteller. When you have no chance of winning and therefore nothing to risk, it's cheap and easy to stick to your guns. But as Ron Paul has shown, back when it actually mattered he was willing to do whatever he needed to raise money and rekindle his political career. I don't doubt that he'd do it again if anything serious were on the line.

POSTSCRIPT: This is also why adults should stop taking fruitcakes seriously. A guy who's a loopy conspiracy theorist today was probably a loopy conspiracy theorist yesterday, just with different conspiracies. It's only a matter of digging them up.

<!-- sphereit end -->

 

what church does ron paul attend?

 

Damn, just a few weeks ago Obama wasn't black enough. Now he's the second coming of Malcolm X. My, how some people are so easily scared.


Hillary's people are digging deeeeeeeeP!

 

A political hit piece with no proof with writings from a period when Ron Paul was out of congress and back delivering babies of all colors , often for free.

 

So he didn't know about his newsletter?:dunno:

And why were these racist people using his name to spread their message?:dunno:

 

Thanks for not answering. We always expect the least from you.::

 

Will Obama have segregated prayer meetings in The White House?

Will he have a white servant boy serve as his personal footrest.............like in "Mandingo"?

Will Obama replace the American Eagle as a National symbol of endearment with a Newport Menthol Cigarette?


The public wants to know. :dunno:

 

If you do any research on it you'll find the answer.

He has flat out denounced it , and stateted publicly that he feels responsible for not knowing what was being written in that Newsletter (All of which can be traced to an amount counted on one hand that had questionable comments) over a period of 10+ years while he was a practicing OBGYN in a poor area that had mostly minority clients.

He stated that it was small minded thinking and anyone that reads Ron Pauls own letters can see how diametrically opposite they are to his normal writings which are all about freedom and equality FOR ALL.

Even with his religious affiliations he recognizes the right of Homosexuals to do as they choose as well. So long as it doesn't harm others.

People can try to paint Paul this way , but in the end it doesn't hold water. It was a weak attempt to dishonor a very honorable man.

 

dsimon writes:

Exactly. :doh:

 

Ron Paul's Faith Snapshot: Religion/Church: Baptist
Ron Paul was raised by Lutheran parents and attended the Lutheran Church regularly during his childhood. Before deciding to pursue a medical career, for a short time Paul considered becoming a Lutheran minister. Two of Ron's brothers, David and Jerrold, are Lutheran ministers. While in college Ron Paul was married to Carol Wells an Episcopalian, and together they baptized their five children in this denomination.

Eventually the couple stopped attending the Episcopal Church and began frequenting a Baptist church in Texas. Although Paul says he is uncomfortable discussing his faith as part of his political efforts, for those who ask, he has published a statement of faith on his campaign Web site.
Ron Paul's Expressions of Faith: In a summary about his faith, Ron Paul writes, "I have never been one who is comfortable talking about my faith in the political arena. In fact, the pandering that typically occurs in the election season I find to be distasteful. But for those who have asked, I freely confess that Jesus Christ is my personal Savior, and that I seek His guidance in all that I do. I know, as you do, that our freedoms come not from man, but from God. My record of public service reflects my reverence for the Natural Rights with which we have been endowed by a loving Creator."

Speaking about the First Amendment, Ron Paul says, " Similarly, the mythical separation of church and state doctrine has no historical or constitutional basis. Neither the language of the Constitution itself nor the legislative history reveals any mention of such separation. In fact, the authors of the First amendment ... routinely referred to "Almighty God" in their writings, including the Declaration of Independence. It is only in the last 50 years that federal courts have perverted the meaning of the amendment and sought to unlawfully restrict religious expression."


More About Ron Paul's Faith:

• Background & Religious Bio of Ron Paul
• Paul: A Seller of Ideas
• Ten Reasons for Christian to Vote for Ron Paul for President

 

Many times ? Whites voting out of sympathy for Blacks and the black race ?

PLEASE show me where ? ::

I'll be waiting .

 

So he's not responsible for something written in HIS newsletter, but Obama is responsible for his church's mission statement?

 

I wonder where this will put Obama in Time Magazines "God-O-Meter"?