I'm still waiting for Petre to give me a plausible explanation on how two of the biggest buildings in the world can be prepared for demolition without anyone knowing it. TFK
Because you can't give me a plausible explanation. I deal in logic and common sense, not imagination. Of course logic and common sense don't mean too much to the people who wear the tin foil hats... You know what I think, Petre? Either your life is extremely boring, and you have to live in fantasy conspiracy land in order to find excitement in your life, or you took way too much LSD back in the day, and it's turned you into a delusional, paranoid fool. TFK
dsimon writes: If I remember correctly there was a dissapearing thread where Dman totally owned you on a topic in physics involving G force:crafty:. Now the details could escape me but....If I remmember correctly you thought acceleration would somehow add to a vector of force that was greater by virtue of dead weight? :crafty: So I would at the very least not provoke Dman again if I were you.:dunno: It could be as brutal as those two shots Nando layed upon Mayorga. :doh:
Thats funny, i could have sworn you said there was evidence that bombs went off and that people actually saw bombs go off. Eitherway, i cant even find that. Where is that thread again? Seems funny that twice we remember you saying something all of a sudden we read it wrong. Hmm.
The whole notion that there were "bombs" in the basement is retarded anyway. It's pretty clear that the buildings fell from the impact point down. I don't see how that can be denied. So how would a bomb in the basement cause they building to start collapsing 80 stories up?
Actually, I think that he was not taking drag into the equation when we were talking about falling objects. He called us idiots for 10 pages, then told us he was just fucking with us.::
Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by PetreTG The guy in charge of security was a Bush. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> Petre, don't try to bull shit your way out of this.. Please tell me in what context that very clear statement should be taken? Face it, you said it in an effort to draw a direct connection between security at the WTC and the current administration. And it is complete, absolute and unquestionably BULLSHIT.. You lied. There is nothing questionable or implied. You made a statement that was false. And as I said, little incorrect tidbits of information are exactly what keeps the conspiracy snowball rolling. You want to talk about dishonesty, either admit that statement was incorrect or everyone knows exactly who resort to BS when there's no factual ammunition in his gun.. That, my friend, is you...
That's very interesting :clap: I will keep this in mind in the future because an incident like this happened before and I thought I was losing it.....
Once agagin. Petre and I and I, have you ever been in a high security building? You have not addressed any absolute first hand account that I have brought up. You have just changed it around and brought up fake facts. Grow up, lamb chop.
He's never been in a high-security building...or any office building for that matter. He has no clue what he's talking about.
dsimon writes: I think both issues were outlined to us sheep. Petre was single handedly taking us back to Newtonian physics courtesy of Galileo's wrong assumption about density and drag.::
So if believe that the U.S. liberated south korea Hussein and al-quaeda had ties There really were weapons of mass destruction right before we attacked Iraq A blackbox can be smashed to pieces with a baseball bat material can be injected away from an explosion. YOu mean, if I believe dumbass shit like that, I won't be a retarded cunt anymore?::
Fake facts, you mean kinda like, when the U.S. showed pictures of the alleged hijackers, then some of them ended up being alive? FAKE FACTS LIKE THAT???
He did. That is when we asked him if the sounds could have been falling debrie or if it could have been the elevators that fell to the bottom of the shafts since that did happen, but petre couldnt agree with that. It had to be bombs. His consperacy websites said so.
So if you heard witnesses say that they heard bombs go off before the buildings fell, you would believe it?
You've never been in an office building, let alone a 110 story one. You have no clue what you're talking about, so shut up.
Can you tell me how a witness would know the difference between a bomb going off and an elevator falling 100 floors hitting the bottom of the shaft? Could you imagine the sound that elevator would make hitting the ground?
One is an explosion, the other is not. Two completely different sounds, and would have different outcomes, one would EJECT (CYC) debris from the area. You don't believe that they know the difference in the two, yet you believe them when they talk about building engineering and claim that the trusses of the building were coming apart. ::
When have "I" ever talked about trusses or engineering from a casual witness? Your memory is failing you boy. Or is this just another lie from you? I think this post is the very first time I have ever written the word trusses.
I never said you or anyone here did. I said that you guys believe eyewitnesses when they speak of things that fits your conspiracy theory, but when something doesn't fit, the eyewitness doesn't know what he is talking about, like you tried to say they don't know the difference between the sound of a building falling, hitting the ground, and a bomb going off.
Revisionism in action ... you guys have pretty poor memories and now that Cupey destroyed that totally convoluted thread that was originally a completely different discussion ... pat yourselves on the back as history is however the majority remember. :clap:
