Yes , if its injected away from the destruction , what the fuck is so hard to believe. What you just described above happens all the time in airplane crashes. What the fuck are you not understanding you stupid muther fucker ?
A black box doesn't survive but a passport does. :laughing: Wouldn't the least strong material get destroyed before something like a blackbox????
Do you not understand english you stupid muther fucker ? IF IT WAS FUCKIN INJECTED AWAY .... What the fuck don't you understand ... You should die muther fucker !
:: No , all kinds of shit from all different kinds of crashes walks away by itself ... Fuckin retard .
Nah , you are correct. All that forward momentum means nothing ... Yah no what ? Now you don't have to wear a seatbelt anymore. If you actually owned a car I would tell you to go pull the fuse on your air bags as well.
In terms of the subject of the thread... I happened to be off that day, and I watched a lot of the news while everything was going on. Basically EVERYONE was saying that it looked to be blown up, and that there was bombs, sounds of explosions, etc... On that day, it was pretty certain that more than just planes and fire caused those buildings to blow up like they did. All of the news was saying it... Then once they came out with the bin laden stuff and everything, the story changed...and all the attention went towards the evil terrorist and our new never ending war on global terrorism I don't know if you guys remember, but muslim people were getting beat up in the streets and stuff... That's really what sparked my interest when I started hearing the so-called conspiracy theories, because that's exactly what looked like happened, and what everyone was saying. That the buildings were blown up.
Ummm. Sticking to the point, does common sense really tell you that 3 large, heavily populated and visited buildings can be rigged with a shitload of sophisticated cutting charges without anyone noticing? Who doesn't see the orange again?
If this aint the mother of a slips :: I believe you meant it was EJECTED away ... Injected would be what it actually was .... the plane and all it's contents were injected into the WTC and engulfed in a blazing volcanic like explosion which probably produced the absolute hottest burst of flames for the entire portion of time the building burned until falling. Things that would get EJECTED ... would be the contents of the building caught in the blast wave. Things in the explosion itself rarely survive unscathed.
And now there's a documentary out that CLEARLY shows complicity with the MSM. Edited footage and the insertion of the plane coming towards the tower in the second attack. Once broken down and compared side by side ... the editing and manipulation is clear to anyone that's not a complete idiot.
It's stuff like this that confuses me about the conspiracy theory surrounding 9/11.... What exactly is the theory? Were there commercial planes that crashed into the buildings? Do you think they were piloted by someone, and if so, who? I have a theory.. Simply put: Two commercial airliners crashed into WTC Towers 1 and 2. The impact, strutural damage and subsequent fires eventually caused them both to fall.. What exactly does Petre think happened? I would just love to see his theory explained..
They edited the live footage that we all saw on TV and that eyewitnesses saw as it happened? How is that possible?
What you are doing is taking the orange and turning it into the apple my friend. Your eyes should tell you , there are far far too many paths of resistance for any steel structure to fall like it did. Especially looking at #7. But you decide to believe the lie and trust highly flawed theories to justify the collapses. Even FEMA doesn't believe their own theory and the evidence is in their report where they say the likelyhood of their theory is very low. They know the truth but do not want to point at the white elephant in the room and the people do not want to see it. And so the white elephant walks around the room unnoticed. If you've looked into it at all , you know there was plenty of opportunity ... especially for the right types of devices. And none of those buildings ran fully staffed 24hrs a day nor even at 30% capacity over night. Key players were in security positions. Power downs , surveillence shut downs , removal of bomb sniffing dogs in the month prior .... these and many other coincidences are a part of record. Had there been any REAL investigation , the man behind the curtain would have been exposed a long time ago .... but instead you listened to him and didn't look behind the curtain and believed that an orange was an apple even though it was right there in front of your face. It amazes me how stupid so many have become. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. We need some new moto's and morals to the old stories we believed back in our ancestor's days ... a little rewriting is in order . Here ... let me start. If it looks like a duck , talks like a duck and acts like a duck ... it's a goose.
Please , tell me you realize just how proficient they've become at editing broadcasts in near real time. I know you don't believe they paint those marking stripes on the ground during football games and somehow physically move them ... right ?
Petre, I am asking you a simple question.. Do you think what we all watched on live TV was an edited version with superimposed images? Yes or No?
Do not look at the man behind the curtain! <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8n-nT-luFIw"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8n-nT-luFIw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
Was it a "No Plane Theory" movie? If so, I think I saw that but I can't remember the name of it... The only thing about that, is it would be good if someone verified that the video in the movie wasn't manipulated.
That's the one ... the actual videos are all from the news archives ... anyone can verify they were not manipulated by the author. The documentary was originally on YouTube ... and it was almost immediately removed. Live Leak I believe still has it.
DO NOT BELIEVE YOUR EARS <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uxB7R-z6E1I"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uxB7R-z6E1I" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object> Funny how this clip and many others like it got little or no play ... can't have people asking what were all those explosions ... :nono:
So was the explosion and fireball that followed the fake plane hitting the building also fake or was that real and just timed to explode when the hologram hit the building?
Yep, I'm well aware of it.. Unfortunately they can't do it on multiple amateur video cameras.. When I'm at a Dolphin game videoing the game from my seat there are no marking stripes.. Hmmmm.
</P> Petre, we've gone over this a million times.... Bombs aren't the only thing that explode or sound like explosions. Oxygen tanks could've exploded. Acetelyne tanks could've exploded. Gas lines could've ruptured. There are a million different ways to explain people thinking they heard bombs. And I'm still waiting for a plausible explanation of how the buildings were prepared for demolition without anyone knowing, which is virtually impossible. I'm calling you out on this one, Petre. Explain to me how they could've prepared two of the biggest buildings in the world for demolition without anyone knowing. Now, before you start rattling off speculation and conspiracies, remember, I've done work in the city, I know how hard it is to even get into many buildings. I know about security involved, how you can't do anything without facilities knowing. Don't even get me started on the unions. I want a plausible, realistic explanation. I don't want nonsense about rumors of Bush's Uncle being in charge of security, or power outages, or any of that nonsense. I don't want 3rd hand hearsay. I want a realistic explanation. You're up to bat. TFK
Those 'little explosions' sounds like the building collapsing. I know that's not as sexy as a bomb conspiracy, but it makes a hell of a lot more sense. TFK
Wow Petre..just when I started to think you couldn't be any more of an idiot you come through in the clutch.::
Damn it TFK... Don't distract Petre.. I've got him working on explaining how the government superimposed an airplane on all the footage of the 2nd plane hitting the towers. It should be a really kick-ass explanation because it's just like the superimposed 1st down stripe during a football game only it's not just on the broadcast network but EVERY network and camera... Sit tight..
Yeah......forget that it happened in the most densely populated area in the country. I'm sure nobody saw the planes hit. This is the next level of dumb. (cue petre knowing that we wouldn't understand):bears:
