My attention span is fantastic. In fact I can remember way back to when I asked you to give me your theory on what happened.. Guess what? Nothing yet... How did so many cameras from so many angles have something superimposed on their images. It's your concept so please enlighten me...:doh:
yeah, I know, it is rare that questions get answered even when they are cut and dry like "can I have a link to that?" or "can I have the name of a book that details that?" or "could you explain that to me please?". It's kinda funny because the actual information I am asking for could be considered evidence.
Microinjection Microinjection chambers were prepared by cutting an 18-mm hole<SUP> </SUP>into the bottom of a 60-mm plastic tissue culture dish. A 22-mm<SUP> </SUP>coverslip was sealed to the inside of the dish with silicone<SUP> </SUP>grease. Chambers were sterilized by inversion on a UV transilluminator<SUP> </SUP>(UVP Inc.) for 15 min. Ptk1 cells were cultured on inscribed<SUP> </SUP>glass coverslips or Bellco gridded coverslips for 2–3<SUP> </SUP>d to 60% confluency, and transferred to a sterile chamber containing<SUP> </SUP>4 mL of medium. The medium in the chamber was overlaid with<SUP> </SUP>light mineral oil before microinjection. The chamber was placed<SUP> </SUP>on a prewarmed temperature-controlled stage (Fryer Co. Inc.)<SUP> </SUP>at 34–36°C on a Diaphot microscope (<!--ad-->Nikon). Microinjections<SUP> </SUP>were performed as described by Gorbsky et al. (1998). Cells<SUP> </SUP>were injected with wild-type Cdc34 (1.5–7 mg/ml), mutant<SUP> </SUP>Cdc34 (3–6 mg/ml), or buffer (50 mM Hepes-NaOH, ph 7.4,<SUP> </SUP>5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl<SUB>2</SUB>, 1 mM DTT) to no more than 5% of their<SUP> </SUP>total volume. Images were collected with a digital cooled CCD<SUP> </SUP>camera (Photometrics) controlled with Metamorph software (<!--ad-->Universal Imaging Corp.).<SUP> </SUP>Prophase cells were injected in the cytoplasm,<SUP> </SUP>whereas prometaphase or anaphase cells were injected away from<SUP> </SUP>the chromosomes to avoid any damage to DNA. http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/154/4/707 Now who is the dumbass?
Class A Office space is of the highest quality in all aspects ... (EDIT: ADD , INCLUDING SAFETY ASPECTS). I know because I used to own Class B office space and had it classified such by the city inspectors. The reason I say it was considered Class A is because that is what I read in testimony by the workers in the building and according to the New York Times , Blackstone other agencies on the WTC office buildings.
:: Holy shit ! Talk about missing the point . I guess because the 2 words came across together in google you thought you had one .... :laughing:
So are you gonna give me a plausible explanation of how two of the biggest buildings in the world could be prepared for demolition without anyone finding out? And I want an explanation, not a youtube clip, not a link, not some cryptic message. I want a plausible, realistic explanation. I'm waiting. TFK
actually i agree with I and I 's statement until he said nothing can be injected away. And called someone a dumbass. Actually, you missed the point
What is the point when you're not listening. You don't even see what your eyes should tell you , which was the point of this thread. There was plenty of time , opportunity , motive and more. You tell me ... why would "they" not have the opportunity ? Do you think this was Las Vegas ... the Tower's that never "sleep" ?
So in other words, you have nothing. C'mon Petre, I expected better from you. I called you out. Step up to the plate with some evidence. Unless you don't have any. TFK
Nice try TFK ... but I'm asking you to think and you refuse to. Unless I can change that there's no point in wasting my time.
Absolutely wrong.. You have cut and pasted other people's ideas about certain aspects, but you've absolutley never offered your version of what happened.. Also, you've been asked a dozen times in this thread to give a plausible explanation how 3 highly populated, visited and secured buildings could be rigged with large amounts of sophisticated cuttting charges WITHOUT ONE SINGLE PERSON seeing anything.. Has anyone seen that explanation. If so please let me know...:notallthere:
How are you asking me to think? By linking to some footage that may or may not be authentic? C'mon Petre. I asked you a simple question, why are you dancing around it? Either give me a plausible explanation of how the towers could've been prepared for demolition without anyone finding out, or admit that the there were no bombs in the towers. You post these wild conspiracy theories, insult the posters who don't swallow them whole, then stand there with your hands over your ears screaming 'I can't hear you!!!!' when people refute those theories with logic and common sense. I've called you out. Either put up or shut up. TFK
ok, but I'm looking for information on what makes a class A building a class A building. Where are the safety specifications of a class A habitable building located? For instance, I could point you in the direction of absolutely any standard dealing with construction of said building before it is considered habitable, but once it is habitable, aside from the fire codes, I cannot find any info on what safety standards are required for a Class A building. Nothing you said above tells me anything about stored/installed/consumed materials which may be flammable, incendiary, or explosive.
So saying 'Class A' is the highest quality doesn't help...:dunno: I'm not an expert but I think 'Class A' is a step above 'Class B' I hope the extra information helps...
It's not a misuse of a word according to CYC. He still thinks that debris can be injected away from an explosion site.:laughing: And it's not a casual misuse on his part when he says it 5 times in a row and is still defending his use of the word.
Actually, I have that still on tape and it really does do that on CNN, I don't know about Fox. I never gave it much thought until now, but there are plenty of other cameras recording the plane hitting the building, so I can't buy the theory :dunno:
dsimon writes: You dare disagree with Petre? You my friend obiously do not know the nomenclature for common fructus of the Terra. Are you one of those who squeeze the tangerines hoping to make apple juice? ::
dsimon writes: According to Petre's analogy it would make you a noemal functioning member of the herd.
Don't I get points for at least having the right juice, if not the correct color, shape, and texture :dunno: At least I got the taste right, which is more than what your average sheep would get right.
Lets talk about How many fucking reporters must be in on this conspiracy. I wonder how come they arent all dead yet. BTW, what about all of the other videos of the plane hitting?
