Have you ever seen the security methods of any building like that? ANY? You're making wild and very stupid claims and they have been getting worse and worse. Were you at ground zero? Did you see the armored guard that you claim was there clearing evidence? Have you ever been in an office building in the financial district? Or any office building for that matter? Have you ever been in a basement? Do you even have one?
Arben ... when you've actually domne any research on this topic ... you get back to me. I'm not going to waste my time answering questions that were answered long ago. You learn the simple basic facts surrounding that day and the days preceeding it , then I will discuss this topic with you. Seriously. BTW ... once again many of your questions are simply nonsensical ... You're not mentally retarded , are you ? :dunno:
HERE WE GO EVERYONE. Smileys and namecalling so that Petre can avoid something. What a shocker!!!!! :bears:
What research have you done? You post the stupidest youtube videos and that counts for research? I live in New York. I was at ground zero. I saw the work done. I have friends that died. I did not see guards covering up evidence. To say that I didn't look into things on my own is absolutely wrong. Just because I don't sit here and argue with complete morons and liars like yourself and I and I means I don't research or look into things that have directly affected my life. Now let's get into my own office floor. There are about 300 computers. About 20 MASSIVE air conditioning units. In a HUGE closet next to mine is a massive server room with lord knows what going on in there. My floor isn't even a floor. It's tiles sitting on support planks. Running underneath the flimsey tiles is wires. So many wires that you can't even see the ceiling of the floor underneath. Basements? My building is 23 stories with 175 apartments. I have two boilers that are bigger than cement trucks. That doesn't even mention the generators in there. Then you also have to bring the elevator room into consideration. Where an open flame within the gears happens. As any super in a building exceeding 20 floors. If the boilerroom blows, the whole building is fucked. The world Trade Center, having at least five times the amount of stories to cover, MUCH bigger dimensions, and at least twenty times the elevators was basically a 110 story BOMB. Again, have you ever been in a basement? Do you know anything about what you speak of? Quit wasting our fucking time with these bullshit theories. It's one thing to say that the government was inept and didn't do anything before or after the attack. It's another to shart showing STUPIDASS videos that KIDS made saying that some dude superimposed wings and a nose onto live video. Grow up. EDIT: But of course, you're going to go hide behind your smileys and childish insults. You'll respond with videos made by kids from some obscure place like South Dakota who know nothing about what happened there or how things were there before and after the attack. And we're the sheep?
I have been in those buildings . To set those buildings up with explosives to take them down is farther fetched then the movie "Oceans 12".
I'm still waiting on the safety code required for a class A building. Where is a link or a reference or something that I can look at. I want to investigate it. The fact that you didn't know I had a question (after I posted it here three times at least) shows me how much you value others input in a conversation...it seems to equal nil. Just saying a class A building has more stringent criteria than a class B building that you used to own doesn't mean shit. I am looking for a classification system, a set of standards or regulations, or law that makes a Class A build a class A building. Do not worry, I'm versed in building codes and safety systems, and I have a lot of information about standards as they relate to buildings before they are habitable, especially as they are being constructed. I am looking for information on buildings that are habitable.
:laughing: opcorn: :laughing: In a few months this dumbass will deny he ever said INJECT. "INJECTED AWAY FROM THE DESTRUCTION" Can anyone post a video of something being INJECTED AWAY FROM SOMETHING? ::
AGAIN - for the 6th time (how many times does this take before he understands) Read the last sentence. When you inject something , that means you are putting something into something else. If you are looking at this from a perspective "within" the crash as if you were inside the airplane (where the passport was located) , yes you are injecting something into the air. If you took a hypodermic needle & filled it with water and pushed down on it to release all the water , you just injected the water into the air. I'm certain there are other words I could have used (MY BAD) but it seems you are the only stupid muther fucker who didn't understand.<!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message -->
since we have moved to a 5th page I will restate what I said on the 4th page so it doesn't get lost. Originally Posted by PetreTG What question was that ? I'm still waiting on the safety code required for a class A building. Where is a link or a reference or something that I can look at. I want to investigate it. The fact that you didn't know I had a question (after I posted it here three times at least) shows me how much you value others input in a conversation...it seems to equal nil. Just saying a class A building has more stringent criteria than a class B building that you used to own doesn't mean shit. I am looking for a classification system, a set of standards or regulations, or law that makes a Class A build a class A building. Do not worry, I'm versed in building codes and safety systems, and I have a lot of information about standards as they relate to buildings before they are habitable, especially as they are being constructed. I am looking for information on buildings that are habitable.
Then why can't you answer it? I ask and ask and ask, and all you do is avoid the question totally. No, they heard what sounded like bombs. Many things sound like bombs, like gas lines exploding, pro-pain tanks exploding, oxygen tanks exploding, etc. But you keep ignoring these facts, because they weaken your already incredibly weak argument. None of that means anything until you can explain how two of the biggest buildings in the world could be preprared for demolition without anyone knowing. I've called you out for an explanation, you have yet to provide one, or even attempt to provide one. Because it couldn't have happened. You know what visual evidence I have? 2 Airplanes crashing into the Twin Towers. Oh that's right, there were no plaines, only Holograms. :notallthere: Bullshit. My question is the most pertinent question that can be asked when the 'bomb' conspiracy is brought up. You claim it's meaningless because you can't answer it, and your failure to answer it destroys any credibility your conspiracy has. Again, all I've asked for, time and time again, is a plausible explanation on how two of the biggest buildings in the world could be prepared for demolition without anyone finding out. And until you can give me one, all of the nonsense you type, all of the videos you post, all of the articles you copy and paste, they all mean nothing. Give me an explanation, Petre. And if you can't, you shouldn't bother posting in this thread, or any 9-11 thread anymore, because you're just embarrasing yourself. TFK
Damn it... It's a Class "A" Building a;ready.... It's the best. The top dog. Numero Uno.. If you can think of a Safety Measure, they had. They had methane sensors in the bathrooms. They had scales outside the elevator as to never exceed the weight capacity. They had rubber floor and walls to avoid painful falls. Now quit asking because the bitch doesn't have time to explain every single thing to every single sheep.
What's amazing is the conspiracy theorist can come up with the most insane answers to questions (i.e. the planes were holograms) and they think it's completely plausible. However, let the official story say "The explosion sounds might have been from gas lines, oxygen tanks, etc" and it has to be total bullshit.. Sometimes the orange really is an orange fellas
"WHEN YOU INJECT SOMETHING, THAT MEANS YOU ARE PUTTING SOMETHING INTO SOMETHING ELSE First it's INJECT AWAY FROM SOMETHING, now it's PUTTING SOMETHING INTO SOMETHING. Those aren't the same things. INJECTING SOMETHING INTO IS NOT THE SAME AS YOUR STATEMENT "INJECTING AWAY FROM" Material does NOT get INJECTED AWAY from an explosion. Show me a video of this please. :laughing:
AGAIN - for the 7th time (how many times does this take before he understands) Read the last sentence. When you inject something , that means you are putting something into something else. If you are looking at this from a perspective "within" the crash as if you were inside the airplane (where the passport was located) , yes you are injecting something into the air. If you took a hypodermic needle & filled it with water and pushed down on it to release all the water , you just injected the water into the air. I'm certain there are other words I could have used (MY BAD) but it seems you are the only stupid muther fucker who didn't understand.<!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message -->
You know this means a year and a half from now, InI is still gonna be babbling about the definition of 'inject', even though it adds nothing to the topic at hand. But I guess when you're InI, you have to clutch on to whatever you can. TFK
The conspiracy with the "fade to black" then the elaborate hoax of projecting the plane through the building with a 12 second delayed network image was amazing when there were dozens of other videos showing the plane hit :: It has also been said the popping sounds were people hitting the ground :dunno:
I guess it's just another case of him being a victim and us not knowing what its like to be picked on
And in a year and a half from now, CYC will still believe and defend his dumbass statments. Kinda like when CYC clutches on to, keeps repeating and defends his dumbass statements. ::
AGAIN - for the 8th time (how many times does this take before he understands) Read the last sentence. When you inject something , that means you are putting something into something else. If you are looking at this from a perspective "within" the crash as if you were inside the airplane (where the passport was located) , yes you are injecting something into the air. If you took a hypodermic needle & filled it with water and pushed down on it to release all the water , you just injected the water into the air. I'm certain there are other words I could have used (MY BAD) but it seems you are the only stupid muther fucker who didn't understand.<!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --> <!-- controls -->
INJECTING SOMETHING INTO vs your original statment INJECTING AWAY FROM Not the same things, I like how CYC tries to change what he says, to make up for the dumbass comment he said previously. Why is CYC changing what he said to INJECTING SOMETHING INTO SOMETHING? If he is right, why is he changing it at all? :laughing: You dumb mother fucker, Debris can't be INJECTED AWAY FROM the explosion. What will CYC change it to next?
AGAIN - for the 9th time (how many times does this take before he understands) Read the last sentence. When you inject something , that means you are putting something into something else. If you are looking at this from a perspective "within" the crash as if you were inside the airplane (where the passport was located) , yes you are injecting something into the air. If you took a hypodermic needle & filled it with water and pushed down on it to release all the water , you just injected the water into the air. I'm certain there are other words I could have used (MY BAD) but it seems you are the only stupid muther fucker who didn't understand.<!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --><!-- / message --> <!-- controls -->
It's not a simple slip up if you KEEP ON DEFENDING the dumbass statment, or if you repeat it several times as CYC did before I called him on it. I didn't say anything the first few times, thinking that it was just an error, but it wasn't JUST a slip up, after the repeated use and still defending the statment.
