I agree with everything except the Orca being the baddest motherfuckers in the ocean. Marine Biologist have their favorites too. Who knows who would win. Someone should setup a fight between the two.
CYC manages another post from the land of delusion. Some may note .... he's the only one saying he "owned" me. :clap: Who want's to bet I'll hear about how he owned me in many threads to come , when in fact .... all you're doing is owning yourself. ::
So you are saying that in the "CNN video" , as they were approaching , they were close enough to see with their own eyes an underwater attack ?? IS THIS WHAT YOU ARE SAYING ? ANSWER PLEASE !!!
Yeah, yeah. Look, face it, anything shaped like a fucking melon is lumbering, G. Tony Tubbs - fast hands? lumbering. Sumo wrestler - can do the splits? lumbering. Just grow to accept it, your darling orca has no sex appeal! It can kill all the sharks it wants aint nobody gonna care. :dunno:
Thats cool BMB but , in your opinion from the CNN footage , were they close enough to see an underwater attack ?? Also can you please describe how much Petre's youtube clip is edited in comparison to the CNN footage ...
I really love how you twist arguements in a desperate attempt to win a debate. From what was initially nothing but a facetious retort to Octopus' Shark attacks Whale thread ... to this nonsense where you're so busy trying to be right that you can't even stick to the actual points being made. Now you hang on the CNN footage which was obviously an extremely short edited sequence of the KW eating something ... which in the interview it even states the guy got there long after the attack started. Finally ... On the ocean , where waters are actually very clear and you can see incredible distances ... you have as example lets say ... Life guards along ocean shores that spot sharks 100's of yards off shore. If you think for a moment they could not see a large dark mass of something cruising the area obviously alive and swimming at 25 yards , and then when the attack began and the KW brought it out of the water to the surface that it had in fact struck a Great White ... you're just an idiot. On a side note ... I really should recap the banter ... it would be hilarious to see what a raving loon you are. :: You win the debate because I don't argue with morons .... but here's the latest invention to make life easier for you when you "win" debates. This way you don't have to strain your arm everytime you get delusional.
On a serious note ... one thing Killer Whales are not is lumbering. They're one of the fastest and most graceful creatures in the ocean. :clap: Having said that ... they certainly can lumber. They can lumber down on a great white shark with 2 - 3 times it's mass and smash it to peices making that great white bitch run for cover. ::
Stop fuckin dancing and answer the fuckin questions !!! 1 - IN THE CNN CLIP , AS THEY WERE APPROACHING IN THE BOAT SO FAR AWAY IN VERY CHOPPY WATER , DO YOU THINK THEY WERE ABLE TO SEE AN UNDERWATER ATTACK SEVERAL FEET BELOW THE SURFACE TAKE PLACE ?? 2 - IN COMPARISON TO THE CNN FOOTAGE , DO YOU THINK YOUR INITIAL YOUTUBE CLIP WAS EDITED AND HAD ADDITIONAL FAKE CRAP ADDED IN ? YES OR NO
Godfather , since you have seen the CNN clip , can you give us your answers to the questions Petre has been avoiding ?
Damn you just don't know when to give up do ya ... :: 1. I believe they said the Killer Whale BROUGHT THE GREAT WHITE UP TO THE SURFACE AND THRASHED IT AROUND like they do most all their prey . :kick: 2. News flash ... THEY'RE BOTH EDITED YOU IDIOT one tells the story the other shows what they actually managed to capture underwater of the aftermath.:kick: That is unless you think the guy with the underwater camera filmed for 10 seconds and then said ... OK time to go home! :: The attack had already occured ... the underwater camera captured the killer whale eating something AFTER the attack. The EYEWITNESSES said what that attackee was. A living swimming breathing , GREAT WHITE SHARK. Damn you are a goofball and I'll bet you were shit in school. ::
Bro Just answer the questions , yes or no .. Stop fuckin dancing and answer the fuckin questions !!! 1 - IN THE CNN CLIP , AS THEY WERE APPROACHING IN THE BOAT SO FAR AWAY IN VERY CHOPPY WATER , DO YOU THINK THEY WERE ABLE TO SEE AN UNDERWATER ATTACK SEVERAL FEET BELOW THE SURFACE TAKE PLACE ?? 2 - IN COMPARISON TO THE CNN FOOTAGE , DO YOU THINK YOUR INITIAL YOUTUBE CLIP WAS EDITED AND HAD ADDITIONAL FAKE CRAP ADDED IN ? YES OR NO<!-- / message -->
Typical run away , dance around response from Petre when his back is pushed against the wall .. Poor guy even at his age still can't admit when he is wrong .. Instead of answering two yes or no questions , he posts up childish pictures ..
CYC THE THINKER Hmmmm even though he keeps answering me , he's not giving me the answer I want to hear. So maybe if I keep repeating my bullshit enough, everyone will proclaim me the winner of this pointless debate.
Once again ... Typical run away , dance around response from Petre when his back is pushed against the wall .. Poor guy even at his age still can't admit when he is wrong .. Instead of answering two yes or no questions , he posts up childish pictures ..
:: :: :: HAHAHA , Petre is incapable of answering two easy questions because he knows he is wrong ... boo hoo boo hoo .. Now to avoid , he posts childish pictures ... Wow , how low he has sunk ..
Yeah , me too .. It's called AVOIDANCE ..:laughing: :laughing: Stop fuckin dancing and answer the fuckin questions !!! 1 - IN THE CNN CLIP , AS THEY WERE APPROACHING IN THE BOAT SO FAR AWAY IN VERY CHOPPY WATER , DO YOU THINK THEY WERE ABLE TO SEE AN UNDERWATER ATTACK SEVERAL FEET BELOW THE SURFACE TAKE PLACE ?? 2 - IN COMPARISON TO THE CNN FOOTAGE , DO YOU THINK YOUR INITIAL YOUTUBE CLIP WAS EDITED AND HAD ADDITIONAL FAKE CRAP ADDED IN ? YES OR NO
Well, I also disagree with the amount of distance you can see underwater, especially in the kind of water it looks to be in. 25 yards seems to be a long way unless you are in the crystal blue, devoid of chop, and on a sunny day. Of course I've seen underwater footage before and it is beautifully clear but I think certain variables would have to be in place to get optimal conditions. Edit - I checked...North Atlantic visibility can be anywhere from 50 ft to 115 ft optimum conditions. So I guess it is possible. Of course I do think the first clip is edited, it's obvious that two different camera's shot the above water and below water shots. I don't, however, think it is indicative of dishonesty.
And then take into account that this wasn't a 10lb bass swimming around ...it was a 10' 1+ton Great White.
Bro , you can hear them talking .. The fin of of the orca was far enough away for them to start debating if it was an Orca fin.. There is no way in fucking hell they could have seen an underwater attack from where they were ... Fuckin superman wouldn't even be able to do that ..
What in the hell does a video being edited or not edited prove??? Just because it isn't edited don't mean that it CAN'T be fake, and just because it is edited doesn't automatically mean that it is a fraud of any kind. When will CYC explain his wacko theories on editing? And yes, you dumbfuck, everything you have seen on film or video has been edited in some way. Welcome to 1922.
Stop fuckin dancing and answer the fuckin questions !!! 1 - IN THE CNN CLIP , AS THEY WERE APPROACHING IN THE BOAT SO FAR AWAY IN VERY CHOPPY WATER , DO YOU THINK THEY WERE ABLE TO SEE AN UNDERWATER ATTACK SEVERAL FEET BELOW THE SURFACE TAKE PLACE ?? 2 - IN COMPARISON TO THE CNN FOOTAGE , DO YOU THINK YOUR INITIAL YOUTUBE CLIP WAS EDITED AND HAD ADDITIONAL FAKE CRAP ADDED IN ? YES OR NO<!-- / message -->
